Welcome Guest

Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
[ ]

BitJam

Listeners: 9 (Peak: 38)
Songs: 33598, Authors: 5612
BitJam 218 - Out Now!

Search BitFellas

Search BitJam:

Search Modland:

Scene City

content search


breadcrumb

2 - Scene Extreme - 9c - Andromeda Groupinterview

on Wed 23 May 2007 by Ghandy author listemail the content item print the content item create pdf file of the content item

in Diskmags > Jurassic Pack #17

comments: 0 hits: 2958


Andromeda: The legendary Amiga group interviewed
Publication: Jurassic Pack# 18 & PAiN 12/06



Mindriot Demo from January 1993


Ghandy talked to the members of the legendary Amiga group about their comeback, the old times and the future.

Introduction:This is without doubt one of the most legendary if not the most legendary Amiga demogroup ever. Andromeda always stood for quality without respite. Andromeda stands for outstanding productions such as D.o.s., Decaying Paradise, Mindriot, Point Blank, Sequential. Things like the legendary slideshow Seven Seas presenting Fairfax artwork. And last but not least my alltime favourite Amiga AGA demo Nexus 7, which totally rocked The Party 1994.

I perfectly remember when Fishwave and me had to hurry up coming back from the police station in Herning, because someone broke into my car, a "duck" Citroen 2CV the night before. We arrived just in time when the demo competition began. I will never forget how much applause Andromeda received for this demo. Of course the organizers did play it as the very last production. We were told that they resided in a hotel in Herning somewhere near the party, working all day and night long on finishing this brilliant demo. Various rumours were spread on other events in between 1995-98, that somebody would have seen a member from Andromeda.Nobody knew how they were looking like. We were full of hope to see another demo from them, but they never came back.

Unitl one sweet day when suddenly at the Bitfellas forum Archmage and Mr. Hyde emerged without an alert. What a twist of fate - that must be a sign, I told myself. It was finally time to make an interview with the people behind this infinite group. A group that did set standarts speaking of design and that also invented many new effects.



1994: Screenshot Nexus7 by Andromeda
Probably the best AGA-demo ever?


Ghandy: Please each of you introduce yourself with real name, handle, age, family status, job, hobbies etc.

Archmage: I'm Archmage, 31. I have a job as an editor at a publisher and I like a beer, reading, playing and listening to rock, watching demos and drawing. And coffee. Don't forget the coffee.
Interphace: Interphace. I'm 32 - so old I can't even remember my name. Currently I'm doing a PhD. I founded what was to become Andromeda back in 1989 together with Hydra, my brother, and Dr. Jekyll - a fairly good name for a demo group, don't you think ASD? I read and travel a lot, lead a decadent, shallow life and have recently picked up composing music again. Yep, that sums it up pretty much.

Hyde: I'm Hyde, 31. I'm a mathematician, I don't like reading and I take some pleasure in watching demos. Archmage and myself founded what was to become Mind Warriors - a group which later joined forces with Andromeda and made it what came to be.

Ghandy: How came that Andromeda left the stage after their glorious victory at The Party and milestone Nexus 7 ?

Archmage: Having won just about every party in 1994 and the consequent lack of goals after that definitely played into it, but so did studies, girlfriends and rock bands too.
Interphace: People moved to different towns commencing their studies, and consequently we lost much of the daily contact we enjoyed when we made Nexus. Also, we were kind of fed up with the phoney friendship direction the scene went into, epitomised at that time by certain individuals who had lots of influence on the average scener, but who contributed with nada in terms of demo creativity. The spirit of the scene was at stake - and Nexus was the remedy, at least this was what we thought back then. Naivety was big in those days. I actually continued composing music for a while after Nexus, but for me the scene had become an empty place, though Andromeda lived on, hibernating, awaiting the next attack - isn't that the rumour these days? He, he.

In retrospect, I think our greatest achievement, apart from making Nexus, was to rid Lord Helmet, and his junk celebrity journalism, from the scene before caving in ourselves. However, I think the overwhelming effect of Nexus was more in the direction of apathy than inspiration. At the time, there were not many groups around qualified and disciplined enough to pick up the thread. They came later. In this sense, Nexus perhaps was more a curse than a remedy, but a curse I'm still proud to have been a part of conjuring. In fact the working-title of the Nexus project was "Strafferen", in Norwegian, or translated to English "The Punisher" - and punish we did, ourselves included.

Hyde: During the development of Nexus, sometime in 1993-94, Hydra stepped down as organizer and left the job to Archmage. I read in both the Exotica archives and Freax that Archmage was blamed for the lack of releases after Nexus. That's not true of course, in case anyone actually believe that or care. But I giggle every time I come across that statement. Archmage did, and continues to do, a good job.




The Gathering 1994: Sequential Demo
screenshots by pouet, thanks!



Ghandy: And even more, how came that you are back on track now?

Archmage: My friend Hyde started to watch demos again some years ago, and I was more or less reluctantly dragged into it. I then had a brief nostalgic period where I bought a c64 and a couple of amigas and I watched a lot of old stuff all over again, but as much as I love the old period it's not really enough there to hold my attention for very long. I don't want to base my scene life on nostalgia, and for the last year or so I've been updatingand tuning into the new stuff. Although there is a lot of "funprod" (i.e. low self-esteem)-shit out there that just depresses me, I also see some real gems in between. I really like groups that go with their own style, like Traction, Fairlight (Division New Direction), Equinox, Kewlers and Hitchhikr's stuff for instance.

Hyde: In 1999 I downloaded a demo for pc and was disgusted by what I saw. Not looking back, it took me another five years before I downloaded Moppi's Assembly intro. Later, I saw Kewlers' We Cell. By that time I sort of got interested again in the whole demoscene, since I finally thought I saw some improvement from 1994. Besides, it's fun to study the scene and see what is different from when we were active the last time. Many things are the same, some things have changed.

Interphace: As long as the majority of productions aspire to something else than demo effects, computer music, and demo gfx, I'm not that particularly interested in the scene. If I want to see a piece of art I go to a art gallery, or buy an art book. If I want to listen to commercially produced music, I buy a CD. If I want to watch a music video, I watch it on the net or MTV.

I'm solely interested in the specificity and originality of demo making, computer music composing, and computer gfx, etc., which set it apart from everything else. For me this has nothing to do about either being a conservative backwash or a nostalgic, but to retain a self-consciousness and appreciation of what makes a demo a demo, and not something else. As for computer music, it is a genre in its own right, with its own characteristics, which I btw love! To sum up: The copy is seldom better than the original. So in that sense, I guess I'm not back on track.


Ghandy: Do the jobs that you currently have, have they anything in common with the things you did for the Scene previously? Did the experiences you did collect while sceening help you with your job?

Archmage: No, not really.

Hyde: Except that I sometimes must use a text processor and sit up late to finish some work, my scene life has nothing to do with my profession.

Interphace: Not directly. Indirectly, however, it thought me the value of intense group dynamic and friendship - yes, I detest that word - to create something rewarding. The great value of making something together with your friends of course can be an asset for those who are hell bent on group projects in a professional context. It can also drive you mad.



1994: Screenshot from Fairfax' Seven Seas
slideshow by Andromeda



Ghandy: How about all the other former Andromeda members? Are you still in touch? What are they doing nowadays?

Archmage: I'm still friends with all my old personal friends - and some of these happen to be core members of Andromeda. As for the rest, we don't really keep in touch.

Interphace: Hydra, Jekyll, Hyde, Archmage, Blazer, Olly, Quest - the rest I haven't seen for ages.


Ghandy: Your raytraced scroller in Nexus7 will never be forgotten. What about Hydra, your former leader and did you ever have contact again with Lord Helmet who was target of your fuckings?

Archmage: What about Hydra? He's still around. I never had any personal contact with Helmet in the first place. Never liked the guy.

Hyde: I don't think so. I do beleive there were some feeble attempts at mocking the whole incident in a later issue of R.A.W. but apart from that, I must say I think our attack did not get the response it deserved. And that's a pity, really.

Interphace: No apologies - no reconciliation. When you characterise someone as Stalin, or Hitler for that sake, in a widely read disc-magazine, just because you are either so full of yourself, ignorant or a forceful combination of both, like Helmet was back then, add the fact that you, as a member of a competing demo group, misuse your editorial position to invent slander designed to discredit, and this characterisation is directed against the organizer of Andromeda, then you're really gagging for it, right? We don't take piss from a lamer. Also, I do not appreciate your question, not so much because of its irrelevance today, but because of its get-under-the-skin-of-celebrity-tone. Let's not make this into a full fledged Jerry Springer show, shall we?



DemoBEER Oslo - February 2007
Archmage of the long-dead demogroup Andromeda,
also posing to the best of his abilities.



Ghandy: You have the long time perspective. How did the Scene envolve, what did change? Is it better as it is now or do you prefer the good, old times?

Archmage: As already stated, I'm really not into the scene for nostalgic reasons, but if youare to compare there have of course been some changes. There are some really frustrating elements in the scene now, but I'm sure there were back then as well. As Hyde points out, I've been a grumpy old man since I got into this stuff at the age of 13. If anything, the scene seems to have gotten less competitive, but I guess that is because the general age of sceners is higher now, and people tend to compete on other arenas beside the scene. I'm talking real jobs and loans and wives here.
Another change is that the democratisation of the scene through forums like pouet has erased the wide gap between lamer and elite. Personally I like the thought that you earn the right to an opinion, but on pouet it is very hard to distinguish who has any real weight behind them and who is the lame troll. I'm pretty sure that about 90% of the people that hang out on pouet today would never have had a say in the scene in 1994. But if this is a change for the better? You tell me.

Mr. Hyde: I have some thoughts on effects in demos that might fit as an answer to your question. Some fourteen years ago, it was cool to imitate techniques from the computer graphics world: Texture mapping and Gouraud shading were always good and a demo with fast routines showing off some of these techniques was highly appreciated. These techniques were the result of research done in the academic computer graphics world with the aim of enhancing the feeling of photorealism in computer rendered images.

The main reason I personally thought it was cool to make such effects was that the hardware on which we made demos, was inferior. It demanded skill to code efficiently enough.
As time passed, the academic world of computer graphics and the world of those coding realtime graphics on plain off-the-shelf computers have converged. This implied a couple of things, in particular that the hardware that demos are made to run on is now suddenly well suited to implement techniques from the CG community. Also, in 2006, the hardware on which demos are created are more or less geared to make photorealistic 3d games.
Around 1993 I got more conscious about demo effects, and it turns out I've always liked effects that truly belonged in the "demo realm". As Interphace said, there is already an art scene. Pixar, nvidia and ATI do realtime soft shadows and whatever better than most people. Hence, I feel that it is better when a demo shows an effect which has ideas from a different place.

I still struggle with the same question: What qualifies as a pure demo effect? I guess there are no perfect critera, but sometimes you know it when you see it: The "fractal" zoomer of Stellar's Bananamen-intro was something different, for instance. Hitchhkr made a checker board and sinus scroller within a pixel shader. In short, I'd rather watch 1995 than 195/95.

Now, I'm not saying that doing photorealism is eaaazzy work in any way. But I sometimes see demos with a lot of "make-up" and no profound, underlying idea. A rotating static mesh with realtime soft GPUGEMS XI-shadows and HDR rendering is still just as interesting these days as a wireframe rotating static mesh in my eyes.
So to your question: I think demos are better, in terms of the complexity of codeand rendering techniques. What I have been talking about here is what I find to be a need to think about the direction that demos are going. I am not in doubt what I like to watch. Luckily, the scene today offers a great variety.
On a different subject, I would like to say that, apart from us, there does not exist a single group to day with the mentality and attitude of amiga groups like Phenomena or the old Scoopex. I know C64 sceners would say the same thing when comparing the amiga- and the C64-scene; they might be right and it doesn't make my statement false.

Interphace: Andromeda grew out of an immense respect and admiration for crack- and demo groups from the early Amiga days: Unit A, Defjam, D.O.C. to mention but a few. I remember going to parties back in the beginning of the 90's, when we were nobodies in terms of scene currency. The disparity between elite and lamers, like we were at the time, was immense - at least this was the very real feeling. However, it is important to remember that this was also a generational thing. You became friends with those belonging to the same generation, and mostly competing and chatting with your equals. The elite were in a different dimension, unreachable for the likes of us. When we became a part of the elite sphere of the scene, in a sense, that culture already had been waning for a few years. Friendship became the novel buzz-word, but as already mentioned, it was a phoney thing, because it just hid the power structures and incentives that drove most sceners anyway - respect from your peers and being the best.

Friendship was basically invented by that middleclass of demo groups, which understood that they would never reach the pinnacle of the scene and at the same time not beingwithout considerable talent altogether, imposed the friendship shackle on the rest through disc mags and mainstream productions. But at parties, they were too keen on affiliating upwards for their fancy for friendship-in-da-scene jargon to be taken seriously. I for one had not joined the scene for such reasons. When we sent the fuckings in Nexus, it was just picking up a long standing scene tradition that was dying out, namely: seriousness vs. the friendship ideology.
It's quite possible to behave as a nice person on a demo party without having to preach the importance of friendship in your productions. Already back then, we saw this as a pre-emptive strategy for eluding critique and hiding lack of progress. Andromeda, on the other hand, was an extremely serious minded group when it came to its productions, which also meant that we generally didn't like just-4-fun productions. It was either honest, serious demos or nothing at all. When we tried to be funny in smaller productions, we failed miserably. Back to the future: Browsing around on e.g. Pouet and other scene forums on the net today, the impression is a lot of dishonest positivism. In fact, those who make qualified critical comments in net forums too readily are disciplined for being negative by the majority. Most comments posted are utterly superficial or trivial; hence there are no insights to be gained by reading them only senseless flatter. Judgements are usually - only - based on a completely private and subjective character, and hence, fail to become interesting. The difference between now and then was that such comments used to retain its private character, a silent awe in a dark basement apartment, whilst now are published on the net in public.

Of course there is nothing democratic about this as long as people are rebutted when voting/commenting what they really think. This is perhaps a facet of today's scene thatstarted back in my days - "friendship" as intoleration. When it comes to the distinction between elite and lamer, it still exists; we just name the institution something else, but the institution is still there, although it has attained different forms and functions. When it comes to demomaking, I think it has improved enormously when it comes to design; at least much more effort is put into this aspect of the productions nowadays. Even Chaos seems to finally have come to terms with design - which is something, indeed. Though, there is a tendency to focusing too much on looks, and too little on the mind-boggling effects that push the demo frontier further. But, my opinions in these matters, as I'm not a properly a part of the scene anymore, are beyond what sensibly can be called interesting I'm afraid.



Solskogen 2006: hyde and archmage with a very special message
(they actually asked if this picture could be taken just for slengpung)



Ghandy: An own domain was set up for your group, what are your future plans. It is sure that it wont be easy to fullfilll the extreme high expectations that people will have when they see the brand Andromeda once again.

Archmage: While these expectations might be, as you say, "extremely high" with a handful of old amiga sceners, I honestly think that the rest of the people in the scene have no idea of who we are. And I am totally ok with this. If we were ever to release a demo on PC or a frigging mobile phone for that matter, this would NOT represent the next evolutionary step from Nexus 7. Too many years have passed for that, demos have changed (luckily) and the people who expect Nexus 8 will be disappointed. We are pretty much starting from scratch as a group, so if you were to compare an eventual new demo to one of our former accomplishments, it would have to be D.O.S. or even some earlier stuff. Besides, sequels are never ever any good.

Interphace: If you are referring to the demo coded by Mr. Hyde back in 1995 on his Amiga; a demo so impressive, so mind boggling that it has used the last 11 years or so to precalculate every frame and export it to PC? Then it was supposed to be released shortly. Problem is that a power failure just recently ruined the whole project, so now it is more likely to be released in 2017. It's called Sexus Seven and revolves around seven naked dancers in silhouette to trance techno. So, I guess one must put patience as the highest virtue if one is to expect a demo from Andromeda; before 2017, that is.

Mr. Hyde: Anyone hoping to relive the days of their youths are living a false hope. What can be done is to take the spirit of the old days and pushing new ground. Consider any successful demo group at its peak: Take their most famous demo and compare it to the one that came after it. It is very likely that they will be very different. The lesson to learn from this is that if you like a particular demo, you should watch this demo and not ask for a sequel. Doing sequels is like putting frosting on a rotting corpse to make it taste better. This would not only apply to us, but to many active groups today.

Archmage: Painting has changed completly. How many skills are needed to create a good picture with modern software applications like Photoshop as you don't need to set each pixel anymore like done with tools like Dpaint etc. ??
Arch: Personally I find it harder now, mainly because of the innumerable possibilities offered by programs like PS. Dpaint was a tool that was much more limited, and consequently you had a stronger feeling of control. Luckily, I feel that I've evolved a lot when it comes to ideas and composition (even though I still feel that a good compopicture should consist of a dragon and a hot babe, and I intend to release one at BP. Be warned! ), but I'm still pretty new to the new media and it's only these past few weeks I've had a vague feeling of "getting it". I've still got a lot to learn about brushes and their uses, but these things come with time I hope. I find myself missing good 2d gfx in demos these days, and I hope to make my small contribution to mend this. Even if it involves learning how to ride that bike all over again.

Ghandy: You have been at Kindergarten party in Norway. Compared to old parties, did you enjoy being there?

Archmage: As I was the only one who attended Kindergarden, I guess this one is for me. And yes, I enjoyed it very much. I also attended Solskogen this summer together with Hyde, and both Kindergarden and Solskogen are good, friendly parties. The scale of these parties is of course much smaller than the ones I attended in the early 1990's, but as a result you actually get the overview and you get to know people pretty quickly.

If I have to point out a difference from old parties, I spot a shift from what I would call the "serious" focus of the old days, which basicly consisted in 15 year old guys trying to stay on top in a hardcore elitist powerplay made up from of equal amounts of scene politics and skills, to parties with emphasis on "partying". If my party attendance on this side of the Millennia is anything to go by, I believe that this shift results in a less serious attitude towards the compos, and at Kindergarden you got some very odd results - as already discussed to death on pouet and Bitfellas.

Still, I expect that things will be different on bigger parties like for instance Breakpoint, so I will refrain from generalizing too much. But it triggers a thought or two about theNorwegian scene when all the best demos released on a small party such as KG come from abroad.

Mr Hyde: Solskogen was a lot of fun! I'd like to thank Quisten and Gloom for their advertising campain. I sure was happy to see that I was not surrounded by CS-playing lamers, but instead having the opportunity to enjoy a beer in the company of very interesting people like Break, Blueberry, Zerox, The incredible Tow-El from planet Crypton, Slummy, Leia and Bitchard.
I'd say Solskogen was just as in the old days, with some mild changes like more beer and, for me personally, no deadlines to keep. Every single party I went to during to 90's I had to lock myself in some closet with Jekyll and our mutual friend, AsmOne. At the Party in '94 we ended up in a hotel room before the deadline, not getting to participate at the party at all.
But I have to say; next time there has to be more coffee available. Damn.



Noumenon - their comeback at Breakpoint in 2007 !
sadly on Pc



Ghandy:Any greets you would like to send out to the friends out there. I guess most former Sceners will never read them anyway but still .. go ahead and do it!

Archmage: At the parties I've attended recently I've hung out with a lot of nice people like Strife, Zerox, Leia, Slummy, Proteque, Bitchard, Break, Truck, Gloom, Blueberry and the nice guys from Ephidrena. So hi to them. I'd also like to send some friendly fuckings to the old geezers at Bitfellas like Alien, Stingray, M:et, Kent, Chromag, Virgill, Axel, Keopsand the rest. As for former sceners, there is hardly any point, is there?

Mr. Hyde: I mentioned some people before, let my add some personal hellos to Haggis, Onkel, Smash and Axel. Finally, some respects to some of the people I would like to see more productions from: Kewlers, Hitchhkr, Keops - and Jekyll.

Interphace: As you probably can infer from my answers in this interview, I do not have many friends, and hence nobody to greet, except perhaps Lord Hell Met. A scene friend for life.

Interview performed by Ghandy


Please log in to post comments, if you are not registered please sign up now
Render time: 0.2018 sec, 0.1543 of that for queries. DB queries: 87. Memory Usage: 1,279kb